Read everything free. Sign in to post, RSVP, and back a player. 214 people are in the walk-on AMA right now.

Report

The 105 cap is going to quietly end walk-on programs, and nobody's covering it

Marcus Aleo8h88 replies51 voices
I've been pulling roster sheets across the Big 12 for two weeks. Posting what I found because the national coverage has been almost entirely about revenue sharing and the portal, and this is the part that actually changes locker rooms. Under the old structure you carried 85 scholarships and a tail of 30–40 walk-ons. Scout team, special teams, the guy who runs the opponent's offense in practice all week and never plays a snap on Saturday. The hard 105 cap doesn't add scholarships so much as it deletes that tail. Every scholarship you add comes out of the same 105. So the math for a coaching staff is brutal and obvious: why carry a walk-on when that body could be a scholarship player? Three programs I looked at have already cut their walk-on numbers by more than half. Utah is not one of them yet. That's a choice Whittingham's staff is making, and it's worth understanding that it IS a choice, and that it costs something.
640Join to replyReading is always free.

88 replies · 51 voices

Ryan Teague8h
This is the best thing I've read about the cap and it's on a message board that's three weeks old. That says something about where sports coverage went.
288ReplyQuote
Jess Kaiwi7h
Do we know if the staff has said anything internally about holding the walk-on numbers where they are? Or is that just what's happened so far and could change in January?
Marcus Aleo7h
Nothing on the record and I'm not going to characterize private conversations. What I'd say is the number has held for two cycles when it didn't have to, and that's not an accident.
141ReplyQuote

You can read every word of this without an account.

Joining is free and takes about fifteen seconds. It lets you reply, RSVP, and back a player — and it puts a number next to your name.

Join the family — free